Let me tell you a little story.  Early last year, I'm talking February of 2008, maybe even late '07, I was perusing the Breakdowns (the online casting notices sent out to agents and managers) and spotted this cool ass role on a webseries.  Now I had just finished shooting 'After Judgment' and we were in the editing, 'what the hell do we do with this', phase so seeing anything to do with a webseries on the mainstream breakdowns (as it was still a fairly new phenomenon) piqued my interest.  The role was for a sexy thief named Madison and the show was called The Bannen Way.  A website was listed on the breakdown so I surfed over to a fairly sleek promotional site that gave the full run-down on what this nifty little webseries was about, what it would look like (it even had a video mashup of other films to show the style), the products it could integrate, and the audience it was targeting (umm any straight male with a heartbeat).  I'm sure I must have given it the 'well I'm impressed' nod, but then a 'well it's not really my cup of tea as there are just a whole lot of babes with boobs' eye brow raise...and then submitted myself anyway.  I never got an audition.

Cut to September of '08 and I happened to make a comment on an entertainment lawyer's Facebook link about webseries which ultimately resulted in a message from some guy who was producing a webseries himself, and his name was Mark Gantt.  His Facebook avatar looked so familiar...right! He was one of the guys behind The Bannen Way who apparently didn't think I was babelicious enough to even audition for his show.  But I messaged him back anyway as he seemed quite nice and then checked out the new site.  Holy shit! The site was gorgeous, with a small teaser trailer...Jaguar, Miu Miu and Prada product endorsement, everything shot on the RED.  Who the hell were these guys and what connections did they have? I was struggling to prep for the indie release of 'After Judgment', Mike and I having no idea really what we were doing and racing (with our webmaster) to get our site up and ready, and here was this show that just seemed to have everything primed and prepped for the big time.
So I exchanged phone numbers over Facebook and had a two and a half hour coffee with Mark...and found out that everything I saw on the site, every product placement, every gorgeous piece of content, had been independently achieved, produced and financed by Jesse Warren and himself.  I was honestly flabbergasted and then incredibly inspired.  There was no benefactor behind them, no studio deal (yet), they had cold-called Jaguar to borrow a car for the shoot, called in production favors, and designed and built the site themselves.  My conversation with Mark was an eye opener.  I'm not saying they didn't have resources (and not that I'm privy to that info anyway) but they've both been in the biz for a while and Jesse's wife is O.C. actress Autumn Reeser, and regardless what their combined bank statements look like, they independently produced a killer online sizzle reel, two awesome episodes and built a beautiful site...all because when they sent the scripts to agents and studios, they were rejected across the board: 'Show us something'. So they did.
What is my point here? The Bannen Way and Mark and Jesse are as indie as the rest of us. They just made something on spec (and on point) that the studios were eager to compete over and ultimately buy.  If Mark and Jesse had chosen to release the episodes that they had already shot on their own in '08, I guarantee you they would have been at the Streamys last year and probably won.  But they kept things under wraps and waited to make a studio deal. Good on them for the faith and patience.  Don't turn on them or the show because you're angry that Sony released three episodes in advance of its official release date so that it would be Streamy eligible: The slick studio throwing its shiny new webseries, chalk-full of Hollywood stars, on its site with no warning, so that it can take home all the awards for a year that it wasn't even really streaming during and then it will win everything AGAIN in 2010?  Sure, I understand the general frustration.  But what if Sony had set the official release date for December 23rd? If those three episodes that are on Crackle right now were 'officially' released, would it make a difference? But Sony made a business decision, based on whatever X, Y, Z variables to release the series in January, probably due to some ancillary market distribution deal.  And come to think of it, what if Sony had released say 5 episodes in 2009 and the remaining 9 in '10?  'After Judgment' released 8 episodes in '09 thus we're still eligible.  Same problem but no cloak and dagger routine.  So is it the underhanded, slightly shady Hollywood-type play that Sony made to a) make Mark and Jesse happy so they could have a shot at a 2010 award and b) take advantage of any potential Streamy publicity, that we are miffed about, or the fact that one season of a studio webseries is now eligible for two Awards seasons, thus potentially taking away awards from deserving, low budget fair that could use the exposure?  I'm thinking it's a bit of both but neither is the fault of the show itself.  We should be thanking the internet gods that The Bannen Way is good.  
Obviously the rules need to be re-examined and possibly re-fined next year, but as they are now: 3 episodes released in the '09 calendar year means Streamy eligibility.   The Bannen Way is eligible.  Done.  That means some of us won't get guest star nominations because Michael Ironside and/or Robert Forrester get it instead.  Well that does kinda suck. But that's the real world baby and if more of the mainstream media picks up the Streamys because of The Bannen Way, then more mainstream studios and their offshoots, and then independent financiers and brands will have the confidence to finance original content for the web and that behooves us all.  We're the original players kids so make all this craziness work for you. 
One last thing...this debate also means the Streamys mean something to us as a community. In one year the Streamys have become a big thing.  I remember Marc Hustvedt telling me about his plans for the Streamys in November '08 and I remember thinking 'how cute'. Nothing cute about it these days (well except for the pic of Felicia).  Also remember, there is an actual board, an IAWTV membership that votes on the Streamys, comprised of YOUR PEERS and I'm fairly confident that this board takes their role pretty seriously.  It has the responsibility to push our space to the forefront but it also doesn't want to be seen as a Hollywood sellout.  I'm hopeful that the great shows and talent of '09 will be recognized. 
So! Run your campaigns, vote and support the space, watch The Bannen Way and enjoy what Mark and Jesse have achieved.  Know that if you have a kickass mainstream idea that you can deliver on and that can be monetized across multiple platforms, the web arm of a studio will probably be interested.  If not, just tell a story that you are passionate about. This is going to be an awesome year.

T




  • Share
  • Categories: Blog Posts
Being up for consideration after only 3 episodes seems too quick. Take 'Riese the Series', for example. After 3 episodes, I still am not sure what all is going on. Hard much dialog in those 3. Would be better if only whole seasons or at least well over the half way point. At least then you can fully see the creative vision, and then judge whether it deserves an award or not. Sure, I guess if the first 3 are sooo intriging, heart stopping with awesome acting and story... Like After Judgement and Compulsion, then I can possibly see the quick decision. Would still be fair to have only whole seasons qualify for nominations... Just my opinion
Grrr.... Late night typos. "Hard much dialog..." Should read "Hardly much dialog..." Sorry long day at work :)
Good points Jeff!
Tom
Creator/Producer/Writer/ActorInvention with Brian ForbesSafety Geeks: SVIThe Archaeology of Comedy

Good points Jeff!


Tom
Creator/Producer/Writer/Actor
Invention with Brian Forbes
Safety Geeks: SVI
The Archaeology of Comedy
I would agree with Jeff. I think the issue here is not the legitimacy of The Bannen Way as series worthy of nomination but rather the criteria by which it has been allowed to be eligible. The Bannen Way and its creators should not be criticized or slammed for their remarkable achievement in producing a high budget series.

The Streamys as a celebration of storytelling should recognize that a season or series constitutes a story not three episodes and as such should require that series be finished broadcasting in the appropriate calendar year to be eligible.

Three episodes as a minimum requirement is important, but how about a new rule that the final episode for that season/series must have been broadcast in the 2009 calendar year? Because this rule doesn't exist, I think it is unclear as to how the Streamy judgment occurs - is it based on the quality of three individual, standalone episodes or the ability of the filmmakers to tell a story over a season/multitude of episodes? That is the real issue.
Are primetime series only judged on 1 episode or their whole season? I'm not sure. I believe acting performances are judged on 1 episode. I think the 3 episode requirement was a fair idea from the Streamy committee considering most shows have to work quite hard to complete and finance their "season" and may not have it completed by the end of the calendar year. I think requiring that a series be "complete" to be eligible would mean either a) low-budget shows will not be considered because they cannot afford to complete a season or b) all shows would be released at the same time of year in order to complete their season within a calendar year. I don't know-- I'm not for that. I think the whole point of web video is that you don't have those sorts of rules, and it allows independents to get their work scene and judged at whatever pace they can release their work. I do think you can make a fair assessment of content by 3 episodes, but perhaps it should be increased to 5 episodes next year. Also, I don't think we can judge the streamys track record by one year. Who knows what will happen this year! However, I do appreciate Tom and other's rally to get independent web series like ours as much credit as possible. As one of the little people, I really hear you :)
Daryn
Downsized the Web Series
http://www.downsizedthewebseries.com
follow @downsizedseries

Is The Bannen Way geo-locked?  If so that means that it is strictly not present on the WWW. Right?  For a show to be eligible it should have been released to the entire WWW.  
If and when that happens The Bannen Way will make a great addition to the Streamys.  However large studios should be on notice that we live in a global world and it is time to re-evaluate their business model.
The same would apply to a show like Harpers Globe which was originally geo-locked.  
If members of the Academy cannot view a show in their home domain it simply should not be eligible until such time that it has been distributed world wide.  This is the WWW after all.
— or sign up for an account.
  • Read earlier discussion
  • View all
  • 30 Responses